VeriPD
Compare

Compared with how it is usually done today

Most continuing-education programs run on a mix of tools that each do one job. This is how that compares with keeping the whole chain in one record.

Question Email and PDFs Spreadsheets Generic application tool LMS plus a separate tracker VeriPD
Is everyone on the current form? Whatever version was attachedNot applicableYes, but forms are genericNot applicable Versioned forms; each application pinned to its version
Who changed what, and when? Search the inboxRarely recordedDepends on the toolSplit across systems Every write in one audit trail
Disclosures and their mitigation Chased one at a timeTracked by handA form, without the assessmentOutside both Self-completed by each person, assessed and kept with the file
Reviewer conflicts and assignment By memoryA column someone maintainsPartlyNot applicable Region and declared conflicts respected automatically
Annual NARS report Rebuilt by handRebuilt by handExported, then rebuiltExported, then rebuilt Previewed, exported and reconciled from the record
Certificates per credit type Made one by oneMail mergeNot applicableUsually one credit type One per credit type, each with a verification code
Can an employer trust the certificate? Only by calling the providerNoNoOnly that it was issued Checked through the whole chain as of the activity date
Employee compliance Not coveredA separate spreadsheetNot coveredRe-keyed into the tracker Records verify themselves when they come through the chain
Is anything ever lost? EasilyOverwrittenDepends on the toolDepends on both Nothing is ever hard-deleted

The difference is not any one feature. It is that the application, the activity, the certificate and the employer’s record are the same record, so each party can rely on what the one before it established.

See it with your own workflow in mind.

Tell us who you are and what you run today. We will walk you through the parts that matter to you, using your own process as the example.